Audi Q5 2012 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 78 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q5 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A5 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 10 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Audi Q5 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |