Audi Q5 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 75 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Audi Q5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A5 | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Audi Q5 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi Q5 is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q5 has 49 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Audi Q5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |