Audi Q5 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi Q5) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Volvo XC60), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 82 HP more power than Volvo XC60, but torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 14.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.71 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q5 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1560 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Audi Q5 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`490 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |