Audi Q5 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Audi Q5 engine produces 7 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Audi Q5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi Q5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1410 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1530 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Audi Q5 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi Q5 is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q5 has 49 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Audi Q5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |