Audi Q5 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010

 
Audi Q5
2012 - 2016
Nissan X-Trail
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds11.2 seconds
Audi Q5 engine produces 7 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.36.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi Q5 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Audi Q5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1410 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1530 km on highway1180 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.64 m
Width: 1.90 m1.79 m
Height: 1.63 m1.70 m
Audi Q5 and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres479 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1560 litresno data
Audi Q5 has more luggage capacity.
Audi Q5 has 61 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2602`170
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
Average price (€): 26 6008800
Pros and Cons: Audi Q5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Nissan X-Trail has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv