Audi Q5 2008 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 84 HP more power than Citroen C-Crosser, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Citroen C-Crosser. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q5 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q5 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi Q5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Audi A5 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 540 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1560 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Audi Q5 has more luggage space (by 99 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Audi Q5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`445 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |