Audi Q5 2016 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 99 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q5 could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q5 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Audi Q5 is larger. Audi Q5 is 28 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1630 litres | |
| Audi Q5 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |