Audi Q5 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 72 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 10 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q5 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q5 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 130 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |