Audi Q5 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 103 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 174 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.6 | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q5 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Audi Q5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1510 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |