Audi Q5 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q5 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Audi Q5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q5 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Audi Q5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q5 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Audi Q5 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1608 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi Q5 has 422 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q5 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Audi Q5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q5 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |