Audi Q3 2011 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 7 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 690 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is smaller. Audi Q3 and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
| |