Audi Q3 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi Q3 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q3 has 115 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Audi Q3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |