Audi Q3 2011 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 12 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Tiguan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is larger, but lower. Audi Q3 is 2 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q3 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Audi Q3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`155 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi Q3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Audi Q3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |