Audi Q3 2014 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi Q3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 68 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 195 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is larger. Audi Q3 is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | no data | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q3 has 83 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |