Audi Q3 2014 vs Skoda Karoq 2017

 
Audi Q3
2014 - 2018
Skoda Karoq
2017 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP115 HP
Torque: 380 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds10.9 seconds
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi Q3 engine produces 69 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1250 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1160 km on highway
880 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 173 mm (6.8 inches)176 mm (6.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.38 m
Width: 1.83 m1.84 m
Height: 1.61 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1365 litres1630 litres
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space.
Audi Q3 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 265 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2251`910
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 16 20017 000
Pros and Cons: Audi Q3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Skoda Karoq has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv