Audi Q3 2014 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi Q3) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Karoq) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 34 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |