Audi Q3 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 34 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, but torque is 20 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1365 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Audi Q3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`225 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`625 kg | 1`715 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 635 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |