Audi Q3 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 34 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q3 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q3 has 131 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Audi Q3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 34 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |