Audi Q3 2014 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Audi Q3 engine produces 34 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
Audi Q3 is 14 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 589 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 129 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |