Audi Q3 2014 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Audi Q3 engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is smaller. Audi Q3 is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
| Audi Q3 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |