Audi Q3 2014 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi Q3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon, Seat Ateca | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is larger. Audi Q3 is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | no data | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q3 has 83 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |