Audi Q3 2014 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon, Seat Ateca | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |