Audi Q3 2014 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Audi Q3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Compass, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2017: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | no data | |
| Audi Q3 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |