Audi Q3 2026 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 63 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi Q3 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.71 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 488 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1289 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 62 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 588 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`300 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`705 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 720 kg | |
| Audi Q3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 52 400 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |