Audi Q3 2020 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Audi Q3) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Skoda Karoq) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 11.30 $ | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q3 has 111 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Audi Q3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |