Audi Q3 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Hybrid | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 34 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, but torque is 10 NM less than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Renault Kadjar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1375 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 92 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 103 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 1`994 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 30 400 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |