Audi Q3 2016 vs Audi Q3 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Audi Q3 2016 engine produces 25 HP less power than Audi Q3 2013, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi Q3 2013. Due to the lower power, Audi Q3 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi Q3 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Audi Q3 2013 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Audi Q3 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 2016 and Audi Q3 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi Q3 2016 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi Q3 2013 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi Q3 2016, so Audi Q3 2016 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |