Audi Q3 2014 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Audi Q3 engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Kuga, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1520 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1640 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 1140 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is smaller. Audi Q3 is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1568 litres | |
| Audi Q3 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 203 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |