Audi Q3 2016 vs Ford Kuga 2013

 
Audi Q3
2016 - 2016
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 367 HP163 HP
Torque: 465 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 seconds10.4 seconds
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi Q3 engine produces 204 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.66.2
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi Q3 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 360 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1090 km on highway
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.52 m
Width: 1.83 m1.84 m
Height: 1.61 m1.70 m
Audi Q3 is smaller.
Audi Q3 is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres456 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1261 litres1568 litres
Ford Kuga has more luggage space.
Audi Q3 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 307 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2152`250
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Audi Q3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 17 80012 000
Pros and Cons: Audi Q3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Ford Kuga has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv