Audi Q3 2013 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 521 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |