Audi Q3 2012 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 67 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Tiguan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Tiguan version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from thirteen 4x4 versions of Volkswagen Tiguan 2011 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`080 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`565 kg | 1`468 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 612 kg | |
| Audi Q3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |
