Audi Q3 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2021

 
Audi Q3
2019 -
Skoda Karoq
2021 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 250 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9 seconds
Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi Q3 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway1110 km on highway
810 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Audi Q3 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ...  More about Audi Q3 2019 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.38 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.63 m
Audi Q3 is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1280 litres1630 litres
Audi Q3 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 350 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0701`930
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 31 20025 200
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Karoq has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv