Audi Q3 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
| Audi Q3 is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1280 litres | 1630 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | 1`929 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`530 kg | 1`318 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 611 kg | |
| Audi Q3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |