Audi Q3 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017

 
Audi Q3
2019 -
Skoda Karoq
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 250 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds8.4 seconds
Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.35.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1060 km on highway
850 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years8 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.38 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.61 m
Audi Q3 is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1400 litres1630 litres
Audi Q3 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 230 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0451`915
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 30 20018 800
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Karoq has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv