Audi Q3 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q3 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
Audi Q3 is 12 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 521 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | no data | |
Audi Q3 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 31 800 | 23 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |