Audi Q3 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Audi Q3 2018 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Audi Q3 2018 1.5 engine Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Renault Kadjar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1525 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q3 has 58 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 1`918 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |