Audi Q3 2018 vs Hyundai Tucson 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is more dynamic to drive. Audi Q3 engine produces 18 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Audi Q3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q3 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Audi Q3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Audi A1, Skoda Scala | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi Q3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 and Hyundai Tucson are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 513 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1525 litres | 1503 litres | |
| Audi Q3 has 17 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q3 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 30 400 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |