Audi Q3 2019 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 245 HP | 110 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 400 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 9.6 seconds | 4.9 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.6 | 4.3 - 6.7 | |
|
Audi Q3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen T-Roc. On average, Audi Q3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is larger, but slightly lower. Audi Q3 is 27 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage capacity. Audi Q3 has 85 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q3 (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`195 | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |