Audi Q3 2014 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 367 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 465 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 10.8 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.6 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Audi Q3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Audi Q3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is smaller. Audi Q3 is 14 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1365 litres | 1568 litres | |
| Audi Q3 has 4 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 203 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`130 | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |