Audi Q3 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 211 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 380 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 9.9 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
Audi Q3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Audi Q3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
Audi Q3 is smaller. Audi Q3 is 25 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q3 is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`105 | ~ 2`499 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 12 400 | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |