Audi Q3 2011 vs Seat Ateca 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 211 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 380 NM | 200 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 9.9 seconds | 8.3 - 11 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 4.3 - 5.3 | |
Audi Q3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ateca. On average, Audi Q3 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi Q3 is 5 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 510 litres | |
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi Q3 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Audi Q3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 1 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`105 | ~ 1`937 | |
Safety: | |||
The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | 12 400 | 21 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |