Audi Q3 2011 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 211 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 380 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 9.9 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Audi Q3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Audi Q3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Audi Q3 is smaller. Audi Q3 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi Q3 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`105 | ~ 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |