Audi Q3 2011 vs Hyundai ix35 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 211 HP | 116 - 184 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 380 NM | 165 - 383 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 9.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 5.2 - 8.8 | |
Audi Q3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai ix35. On average, Audi Q3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
Audi Q3 is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi Q3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 591 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Audi Q3 has 131 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi Q3 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai ix35, which means Audi Q3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`105 | ~ 2`041 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Average price (€): | 12 400 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q3 has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |