Audi Q2 2016 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2020
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Audi Q2 and Volkswagen T-Roc have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi Q2 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Q2 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi Q2 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Q2 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.23 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.57 m | |
Audi Q2 is smaller. Audi Q2 is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q2 is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 445 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | 1290 litres | |
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Audi Q2 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 240 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | no data | 19 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |