Audi Q2 2016 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 190 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 400 NM | 340 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10.7 seconds | 7.6 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 5.4 | 5.7 | |
|
On average, Audi Q2 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Audi Q2 is smaller. Audi Q2 is 16 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi Q2 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Audi Q2 has 145 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi Q2 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi Q2 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |