Audi Coupe 1991 vs BMW 3 series 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 165 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi Coupe engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 25 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Audi Coupe reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
The Audi Coupe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi Coupe consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi Coupe over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi Coupe consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
770 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Audi Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi Coupe) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Audi Coupe is 6 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi Coupe is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 296 litres | 435 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi Coupe has 139 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi Coupe is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Audi Coupe can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`760 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi Coupe has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |