Audi A7 2014 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Audi A7
2014 - 2017
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 245 HP150 HP
Torque: 580 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 seconds8.1 seconds
Audi A7 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A7 engine produces 95 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Audi A7 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.94.1
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi A7 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A7 could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 73 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1230 km in combined cycle1240 km in combined cycle
1370 km on highway1410 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A7 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years12 years
Engine spread: Used also on Audi Q5Used also on Mazda 6, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.47 m
Width: 1.91 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Audi A7 is larger, but slightly lower.
Audi A7 is 51 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi A7 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 535 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Audi A7 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A7 has 171 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A7 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Audi A7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3951`910
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Audi A7 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi A7, so Audi A7 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 43 4007600
Pros and Cons: Audi A7 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv