Audi A5 2011 vs BMW 3 series 2012
Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 211 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi A5 engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW 3 series, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi A5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi A5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2012: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi Q5 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.43 m | |
Audi A5 is larger, but lower. Audi A5 and BMW 3 series are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
750 litres | no data | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi A5 has 160 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 600 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |