Audi A5 2008 vs Audi TT 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Audi A5 engine produces 20 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 40 NM more than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A5 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi Q5 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A5 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is widely criticized for excessive oil consumption, which is one of the most common complaints from owners. This issue, partially addressed by the manufacturer by the end of 2011, persists in high-mileage engines. The primary solution is ... More about Audi A5 2008 2.0 engine Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi A5 is larger. Audi A5 is 44 cm longer than the Audi TT, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
829 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity. Audi A5 has 165 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Audi A5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A5 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Audi TT has
| |