Audi A5 2008 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 312 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi A5 engine produces 142 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 127 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 11.1 | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi A5 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Audi A5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Audi A5 is smaller. Audi A5 is 22 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
829 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A5 has 135 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`895 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |