Audi A5 2011 vs Renault Laguna 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Audi A5 is more dynamic to drive. Audi A5 engine produces 95 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Audi A5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi A5 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A5 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A5 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A4, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Laguna 2012 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Audi A5 is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi A5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
829 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi A5 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. The Renault Laguna may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi A5 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Audi A5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 1`972 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi A5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Audi A5, so Audi A5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi A5 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |